hey now

[ are you calling us myopic? ]

then email it to our faces

mutual

- wonkette
- bkke
- drudge
- fark
- jay
- mcsweeney's
- bloglines
- scribs
- Wiffleball League

jones

- boingboing
- arts and letters daily
- michael chabon
- yahoo most sent
- sullivan
- daily collegian
- sam sloan
- steelers
- SETI@Home

lucas

- atrios
- talking points memo
- daily kos
- oliver willis
- pandagon
- boston sports blog
- johnny most
- politicalwire
- exploding dog
- danziger
- karo
- the sloppy one


Archives
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
August 2006

Site Meter


Get Firefox
someone said








i wish i were an optimist but it probably wouldn't work out




Tuesday, November 23, 2004
The Indefensible Position.

One of my favorite magazines - actually the only one I pay to subscribe to (Scientific American was a gift, and Sports Illustrated just keeps coming) - Esquire, has stopped running a small column I always liked. It was entitled, "The Indefensible Position." I think there's a lot of merit in this, and I intend to keep the tradition alive. It was generally snarky, and made a point. I promise neither of these things. But I do promise a statement that is utter lunacy - and a fairly lukewarm defense. Maybe I'll get better as time goes on.


Today's indefensible position: McCauley Culkin is the most important actor of our time.


Growing up under a cinematic microscope, MC has provided more dramatic and comedic range than most of his contemporaries - PLUS he's a wackjob with a wackjob family, making him less marketable and adding difficulties to jobs he does get. His movie choices read like an EKG - up down, up down - Uncle Buck, Home Alone, The Good Son, Richie Rich, Party Monster. And this was all in about 5-7 years, which managed to include the entire Home Alone oeuvre. Tom Hanks - the Hollywood-Anointed-One, was mailing it in with Turner & Hooch, Dragnet, The Burbs, Joe Versus the Volcano etc. Always playing essentially the same dude, only in one of the movies there was a volcano. It's also worth noting that Hanks was in the middle of his career at this point. So now he's animated in the Polar Express, and I'm supposed to care? Dude, I'd rather be seeing Big Mac on Celebrity Poker.


(Tangent: Hanks has also uttered the worst line in film history, from You've Got Mail - "Don't cry... Shopgirl." If I was handed a script that ended like that I would've opted to take the part only on the condition that I could execute the screenwriter. That would've been a dealbreaker.)


And Mr. Culkin has already been around the block once or twice, while I still have yet to go outside by comparison. I have no raging drug problem (at least not that I've admitted to), I haven't been married or divorced, I haven't been on SNL, and I haven't been adored by millions, written off by millions, and shrugged at by millions upon my under-the-radar return. His characters show this, admit their humanity, and ask us to trade our indifference for redemption - and I remain grateful having been asked. All I can thank Tom Hanks for is wearing a Red Sox Jacket during the World Series, and etching "That Thing You Do" into the soft tissue of my brain for almost a full year. Thanks a lot, Jackass.


UPDATE: Here's the link for previous Esquire Indefensible Positions. I regret that two previous articles in there are along the same line as what I have presented here. Namely : Keanu Reeves is a Good Actor, and Michael Douglas is the Most Important Actor of Our Time. Clearly, I need to write an Indefensible Position on Why Copyright Infringement is good, as well as the Benefits of Plagarism.


Iraq's Inappropriate Appropriation: Thumbs Up!

(JavaScript Error)
click here for more.

> ---!>